10 Feb 2012In my freshman fall at Harvard, I was fortunate to enroll in a seminar on cosmology with John Huchra. In case you're not an astrophysics buff, among other things, Huchra was one of the first astronomers to experimentally observe large-scale structures in the universe using wide-ranging galaxy surveys and, until shortly before his untimely death, he served as the president of the American Astronomical Society.
While my formal study of astronomy ended after Huchra's seminar (although I do lug my telescope out when visiting my parents in Nebraska), Huchra left a strong impression on me. There are certain individuals who exemplify my ideal of a great scientist, who are not only successful but demonstrate a sense of real purpose in their research and enthusiasm for their subject. Huchra's weekly seminar and our often extended discussions afterward were probably my first extended contact with a real-life, practicing professional scientist. Huchra's excitement about his field, his ability to communicate heady concepts such as galaxy formation and cosmic microwave background radiation to a group of university freshmen, and his passion for science heavily influenced my own career path, even if I didn't realize it at the time.
Some time ago, I found a highly accessible (draft) essay Huchra wrote titled "Mapmaker, Mapmaker Make Me a Map", describing his career path and research. Huchra's writing captures his personality well and is worth a read in itself, but I like the essay also for his formulation of the characteristics of a "successful scientist":
…an individual's success in the [science] game could be predicted by their characteristics in a seven vector space. Each vector measured a critical personal characteristic or set of characteristics such as intelligence, taste and luck, and the ability to tell one's story (public relations)…
Looking back on this I've come to realize that being nearly a unit vector in any one of the important characteristics pretty much guarantee's[sic] you a tenured job, two are good for membership in the National Academy, and three put you in contention for the Nobel Prize.I haven't seen Huchra's seven characteristics elsewhere, but I find them particularly interesting:
- Raw Intelligence
- Public Relations
Now, as a greenhorn in Computer Science, I'll not speculate like Huchra does in his essay as to who in my own field constitutes a "unit vector" for each characteristic, nor will I attempt to publicly analyze my own strengths and weaknesses. However, I think this is a thought-provoking taxonomy that deserves reflection. After all, being the smartest person in the room can get you pretty far, but, as with most life pursuits, (perhaps thankfully for most of us) there's often a lot more to success than raw intelligence by itself.
A version of Huchra's essay also appears as a chapter of Our Universe: The Thrill of Extragalactic Exploration as Told by Leading Experts, edited by Alan Stern (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
You can follow me on Twitter here.
- Causality is expensive (and what to do about it) (05 Feb 2014)
- Stickiness and client-server session guarantees (13 Jan 2014)
- On consistency and durability (10 Dec 2013)
- Non-blocking transactional atomicity (28 May 2013)
- Communication costs in real-world networks (17 May 2013)
- HAT, not CAP: Introducing Highly Available Transactions (05 Feb 2013)
- When is "ACID" ACID? Rarely. (22 Jan 2013)
- Using PBS in Cassandra 1.2.0 (14 Jan 2013)
- Doing redundant work to speed up distributed queries (20 Sep 2012)
- Safety and liveness: Eventual consistency is not safe (27 Mar 2012)